Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX75
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Launched June 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FX75, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is very close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FX75 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 2 years later than the FX75 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the FX75 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FX75
XZ-2 iHS | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | June 2010 | Fresher by 32 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FX75 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FX75
XZ-2 iHS | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has dimensions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FX75 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the FX75.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and FX75 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing purely by looking through specifications. The graphic here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and FX75.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FX75 will provide you with more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2010-06-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 7.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 165 gr (0.36 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $450 | $139 |