Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ100
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
67 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 540g - 124 x 82 x 92mm
- Announced July 2010
- Refreshed by Panasonic FZ200
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ100 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ100, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FZ100 (14MP) is pretty similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FZ100 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 2 years after the FZ100 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ100 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the FZ100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FZ100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FZ100
XZ-2 iHS | FZ100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | July 2010 | More modern by 30 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ100 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FZ100 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ100
XZ-2 iHS | FZ100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ100 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ100 has sizing of 124mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ100 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the FZ100.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and FZ100 is 85 and 67 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes just by going over specs. The picture below might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and FZ100.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FZ100 will offer you extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ100 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2010-07-21 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 9.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 540g (1.19 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 124 x 82 x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $450 | $500 |