Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ150
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
67 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ150 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 528g - 124 x 82 x 92mm
- Launched April 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ150 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ150, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FZ150 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FZ150 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 9 months later than the FZ150 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ150 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the FZ150 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ150 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FZ150 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FZ150
| XZ-2 iHS | FZ150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 | April 2012 | Fresher by 9 months | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ150 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| FZ150 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ150
| XZ-2 iHS | FZ150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ150 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outer dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ150 has specifications of 124mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 528 grams (1.16 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ150 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the FZ150.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and FZ150 is 85 and 67 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ150 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through specifications. The graphic here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and FZ150.
To sum up, both cameras feature the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS has got the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler. The more recent XZ-2 iHS will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ150 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ150 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2012-04-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.2 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 9.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 528g (1.16 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 124 x 82 x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 49 | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 19.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 10.9 |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | 132 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | 410 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $450 | $499 |