Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdd51/cdd51cf2d542515b3ba6c6c81eb98dc3a189d634" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front"
53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Announced September 2016
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ1000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ2500, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FZ2500 (1") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was brought out 4 years prior to the FZ2500 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the FZ2500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FZ2500
XZ-2 iHS | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FZ2500 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | December 2012 | More recent by 45 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ2500
XZ-2 iHS | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has measurements of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") accompanied by a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ2500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the FZ2500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53e40/53e4089357f085183ca651391bbfcedd1596f882" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and FZ2500 is 85 and 53 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23a97/23a97de256f46ad69409fbacddaafa5993610f9c" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The photograph here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and FZ2500.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Panasonic FZ2500 will provide you with more detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17f17/17f17d259d0e6ea02a528e2e0c3691ff9d80c29d" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd571/fd571ec573435755926ef01c2e0db9a6f0d9a079" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 915 gr (2.02 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 350 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $450 | $998 |