Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G85
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
              
              69 Imaging
54 Features
84 Overall
66
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G85 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
 - 3" Tilting Display
 - ISO 100 - 12800
 - Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
 - 1920 x 1080 video
 - 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
 - 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
 - Launched December 2012
 
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
 - 3" Fully Articulated Screen
 - ISO 200 - 25600 (Expand to 25600)
 - Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
 - No Anti-Alias Filter
 - 3840 x 2160 video
 - Micro Four Thirds Mount
 - 505g - 128 x 89 x 74mm
 - Revealed September 2016
 - Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-G80
 - Newer Model is Panasonic G95
 
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide        Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G85 Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic G85, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and G85 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and G85 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 4 years before the G85 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G85 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the G85 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone        Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G85 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic G85 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic G85
| XZ-2 iHS | G85 | 
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G85 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| G85 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2016 | December 2012 | Fresher by 45 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | 
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic G85
| XZ-2 iHS | G85 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate | 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G85 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic G85 has specifications of 128mm x 89mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 2.9") having a weight of 505 grams (1.11 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic G85 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the G85.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and G85 is 85 and 69 respectively.
          Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G85 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing only by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and G85.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS using its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Panasonic G85 will render more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
          Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G85 Screen and ViewFinder
        
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
        
                
        Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G85 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic | 
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85 | 
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-G80 | 
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless | 
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2016-09-19 | 
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS | 
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Four Thirds | 
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 17.3 x 13mm | 
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 224.9mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels | 
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3448 | 
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 | 
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 | 
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 | 
| RAW images | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 | 
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 49 | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds | 
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - | 
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - | 
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - | 
| Available lenses | - | 107 | 
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.1 | 
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated | 
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch | 
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic | 
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot | 
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% | 
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x | 
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs | 
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs | 
| Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs | 
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.0 frames per second | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes | 
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.20 m (at ISO 100) | 
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | 
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 | 
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD | 
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 505g (1.11 lbs) | 
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 128 x 89 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 2.9") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | 71 | 
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 22.8 | 
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 12.5 | 
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | 656 | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | 330 images | 
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack | 
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) | 
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | 
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 | 
| Retail pricing | $450 | $900 |