Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G95
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Introduced April 2019
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-G90
- Older Model is Panasonic G85
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic G95, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and G95 (20.3MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and G95 (Four Thirds) use different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 7 years before the G95 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the G95 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic G95
XZ-2 iHS | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
G95 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2019 | December 2012 | Fresher by 76 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 920k | Sharper screen (+320k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic G95
XZ-2 iHS | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic G95 has dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") along with a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic G95 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the G95.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and G95 is 85 and 67 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking specs. The visual underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and G95.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Panasonic G95 will give greater detail with its extra 8.3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2019-04-05 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20.3MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 536g (1.18 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 290 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $450 | $998 |