Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/273c0/273c0c86fa0d6e8d3883c5b8e9356e362cd24887" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 front"
83 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 122 x 71 x 44mm
- Announced April 2016
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85 Overview
Below is a complete review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic GX85, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and GX85 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and GX85 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was brought out 4 years before the GX85 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GX85 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the GX85 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic GX85 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic GX85
XZ-2 iHS | GX85 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX85 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
GX85 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2016 | ![]() | December 2012 | More recent by 40 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic GX85
XZ-2 iHS | GX85 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GX85 has sizing of 122mm x 71mm x 44mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic GX85 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the GX85.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5eeea/5eeea45dfc0e8db91356acd49beaa08d396260b6" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and GX85 is 85 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/025fc/025fc9d74301db0b7a9735466a3d53dd37b69097" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by researching specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and GX85.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Panasonic GX85 will result in extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e1a/86e1a4f2cfc741efad6e88acf776a12fef769a0f" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b6b2/4b6b2b21361329ce1df8f6a9b36d823c3854534c" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GX85 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2016-04-05 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3448 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,764k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 426g (0.94 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 122 x 71 x 44mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | 71 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 662 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 290 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $450 | $800 |