Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LS5
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
94 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LS5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 97 x 62 x 27mm
- Released July 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LS5 Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LS5, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the LS5 (14MP) is very similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and LS5 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-2 iHS was released 18 months after the LS5 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the LS5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LS5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LS5. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic LS5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic LS5
| XZ-2 iHS | LS5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 18 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic LS5 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| LS5 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic LS5
| XZ-2 iHS | LS5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LS5 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic LS5 has specifications of 97mm x 62mm x 27mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LS5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the LS5.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and LS5 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LS5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading technical specs. The image here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and LS5.
As you have seen, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS due to its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Panasonic LS5 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LS5 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LS5 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LS5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LS5 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2011-07-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 126 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 97 x 62 x 27mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | 160 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $450 | $294 |