Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LX3
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
91 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-60mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 265g - 109 x 60 x 27mm
- Announced November 2008
- Newer Model is Panasonic LX5
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LX3 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LX3, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the LX3 (10MP) is very close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and LX3 (1/1.63") feature different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 4 years after the LX3 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the LX3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LX3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic LX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic LX3
| XZ-2 iHS | LX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2012 |  | November 2008 | Newer by 51 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic LX3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| LX3 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic LX3
| XZ-2 iHS | LX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LX3 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic LX3 has dimensions of 109mm x 60mm x 27mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LX3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the LX3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and LX3 is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LX3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and LX3.
Clearly, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS using its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will result in greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer XZ-2 iHS provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic LX3 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2008-11-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-60mm (2.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 8.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (HD 24 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30fps), 320 x 240 (10fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 265 gr (0.58 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 109 x 60 x 27mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 49 | 39 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 19.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | 94 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $450 | $449 |
