Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic S3
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic S3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 117g - 99 x 59 x 21mm
- Released January 2011
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic S3 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic S3, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the S3 (14MP) is pretty similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and S3 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-2 iHS was manufactured 24 months later than the S3 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the S3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic S3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic S3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic S3
XZ-2 iHS | S3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | January 2011 | More recent by 24 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic S3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
S3 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic S3
XZ-2 iHS | S3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic S3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic S3 has specifications of 99mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic S3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the S3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and S3 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic S3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The photograph here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and S3.
As you can see, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic S3 will deliver greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic S3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic S3 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 117 gr (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 99 x 59 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 250 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $450 | $110 |