Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS1
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
93 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 189g - 98 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FT1
- Later Model is Panasonic TS2
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS1 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic TS1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TS1 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and TS1 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-2 iHS was introduced 3 years later than the TS1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the TS1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic TS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic TS1
| XZ-2 iHS | TS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 48 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TS1 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic TS1
| XZ-2 iHS | TS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic TS1 has specifications of 98mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 189 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic TS1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the TS1.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and TS1 is 85 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through specifications. The visual below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and TS1.
Plainly, both cameras have got the exact same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS has got the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult. The fresher XZ-2 iHS will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS1 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 |
| Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-FT1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-01-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 189 gr (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 98 x 63 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photos | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $380 |