Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS20
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
95 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 142g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FT20
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS20 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic TS20, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and TS20 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and TS20 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was introduced 11 months after the TS20 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the TS20 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS20 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic TS20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic TS20
| XZ-2 iHS | TS20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 11 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS20 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TS20 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic TS20
| XZ-2 iHS | TS20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Panasonic TS20 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic TS20 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the TS20.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and TS20 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS20 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specifications. The picture underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and TS20.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic TS20 will provide more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS20 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS20 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20 |
| Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-FT20 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-12-18 | 2012-01-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.9-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 142 gr (0.31 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | 250 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $450 | $179 |
