Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
95 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 144g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2013
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FT25
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic TS25, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and TS25 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and TS25 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-2 iHS was manufactured around the same time to the TS25 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the TS25 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic TS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic TS25
| XZ-2 iHS | TS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS25 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TS25 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic TS25
| XZ-2 iHS | TS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic TS25 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic TS25 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the TS25.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and TS25 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The photograph here will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and TS25.
Plainly, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic TS25 will show more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FT25 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-12-18 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.9-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 144g (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | 250 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $180 |