Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
95 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 144g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2013
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FT25
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic TS25, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and TS25 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and TS25 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe XZ-2 iHS was manufactured around the same time to the TS25 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the TS25 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic TS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic TS25
| XZ-2 iHS | TS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS25 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TS25 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic TS25
| XZ-2 iHS | TS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic TS25 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic TS25 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the TS25.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and TS25 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The photograph here will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and TS25.
Plainly, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic TS25 will show more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS25 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FT25 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-12-18 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.9-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 144g (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | 250 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $180 |