Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1
Portability
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Portability
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Panasonic ZR1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-ZX1
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the ZR1 (12MP) is pretty close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and ZR1 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 3 years after the ZR1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the ZR1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic ZR1
| XZ-2 iHS | ZR1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 42 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| ZR1 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZR1
| XZ-2 iHS | ZR1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR1 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the ZR1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and ZR1 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The picture here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and ZR1.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact resolution albeit not the same sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS features the bigger sensor which will make getting shallow DOF less difficult. The more recent XZ-2 iHS is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Portrait photography with Panasonic ZR1
focusing manually
comes with face detect focusing
saves RAW files
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography advice
Panasonic ZR1 Street photography advice
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
more heavy than competitors in class (346 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Sports photography with Panasonic ZR1
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
good battery (340 shots)
MP count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Optical)
max frames per second low (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic ZR1 as a Travel photography camera
good battery (340 shots)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors in class (346g)
MP count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
missing Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography factors
Panasonic ZR1 Landscape photography factors
focusing manually
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
good battery (340 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
missing Timelapse recording
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
small screen (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging information
Panasonic ZR1 Vlogging information
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does have microphone support
screen isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than competitors in class (346g)
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-12-18 | 2009-07-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $280 |