Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-ZX1
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the ZR1 (12MP) is pretty close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and ZR1 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 3 years after the ZR1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the ZR1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic ZR1
XZ-2 iHS | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | July 2009 | More modern by 42 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
ZR1 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZR1
XZ-2 iHS | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR1 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the ZR1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and ZR1 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The picture here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and ZR1.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact resolution albeit not the same sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS features the bigger sensor which will make getting shallow DOF less difficult. The more recent XZ-2 iHS is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $450 | $280 |