Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a81b/6a81b74be2fc2f5b005db0ba199900d1cad3b423" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 front"
91 Imaging
33 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Announced May 2009
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the ZS1 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and ZS1 (1/2.5") offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was launched 3 years after the ZS1 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the ZS1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic ZS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic ZS1
XZ-2 iHS | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | ![]() | May 2009 | More modern by 44 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
ZS1 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS1
XZ-2 iHS | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS1 has specifications of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the ZS1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/530e8/530e8d335f0203ca9ec7a8b0924ca954b4424a0e" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and ZS1 is 85 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51eed/51eed4d6352b0c95e37b41f7cf61963abbb35da8" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through specifications. The picture here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and ZS1.
To sum up, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will give greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a4f7/1a4f7d022d15ac6aa51431ed3b61161187589b89" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1852/e18525fce55b33dc2d49569fce519c3a99445a40" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ6 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 229 grams (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $450 | $0 |