Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/807b0/807b089857a251fd5fc82ebc6238512c0fcc02c9" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 front"
91 Imaging
37 Features
46 Overall
40
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 219g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Launched January 2011
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ20 / Lumix DMC-TZ22
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the ZS10 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and ZS10 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 24 months after the ZS10 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the ZS10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic ZS10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic ZS10
XZ-2 iHS | ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 24 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS10 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
ZS10 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS10
XZ-2 iHS | ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS10 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the ZS10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88f5e/88f5ee835448a335b824d8c911879afebd92b872" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and ZS10 is 85 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d87b4/d87b4e860fbb281e6305b2eab2463b08a964b3b8" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by checking out specifications. The picture below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and ZS10.
Plainly, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic ZS10 will produce greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS will have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90893/908933752de09cfbf8c4cacca4bb520982a00a46" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/013d7/013d743c40401078a1e7b72c720d2874c4c9ba9c" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS10 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ20 / Lumix DMC-TZ22 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2011-01-25 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 219 grams (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 260 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $450 | $350 |