Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front
Portability
89
Imaging
40
Features
50
Overall
44

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Announced December 2012
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
  • Revealed January 2014
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
  • Succeeded the Panasonic ZS30
  • Newer Model is Panasonic ZS40
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS35, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and ZS35 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 12 months before the ZS35 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the ZS35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic ZS35

 XZ-2 iHS ZS35 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Display resolution920k460kCrisper display (+460k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 ZS35 XZ-2 iHS 
RevealedJanuary 2014December 2012Fresher by 12 months

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS35

 XZ-2 iHS ZS35 
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has measurements of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).

Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS35 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the ZS35.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and ZS35 is 85 and 89 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing specs. The photograph underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and ZS35.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS with its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Panasonic ZS35 will render more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Portrait photography with Panasonic ZS35
46
has manual focus
supports face detection focus
delivers RAW files
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
37
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Street photography with Panasonic ZS35
66
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
small sensor (1/1.7")
heavier than average (346g)
68
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (305 grams)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography info
Panasonic ZS35 Sports photography info
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (340 CIPA)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect auto focus
53
great zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
features tracking focus
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Travel photography with Panasonic ZS35
61
better than average battery life (340 shots)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than average (346 grams)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
68
lighter than average (305 grams)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long reach (480mm)
no Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Landscape photography with Panasonic ZS35
55
has manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (340 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
no Time Lapse function
44
fairly wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Vlogging with Panasonic ZS35
36
pretty wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with external mic socket
does not posses selfie friendly screen
heavier than average (346 grams)
34
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (305 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
no mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS35
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSPanasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus XZ-2 iHS Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
Also referred to as - Lumix DMC-TZ55
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2012-12-18 2014-01-06
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Maximum boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 35 21
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-480mm (20.0x)
Max aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.3-6.4
Macro focusing distance 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Tilting Tilting
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology - TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 6.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 346 gr (0.76 pounds) 305 gr (0.67 pounds)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-90B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $450 $300