Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS30
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS40
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS35, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and ZS35 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 12 months before the ZS35 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the ZS35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic ZS35
XZ-2 iHS | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
ZS35 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | December 2012 | Fresher by 12 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS35
XZ-2 iHS | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has measurements of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS35 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the ZS35.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and ZS35 is 85 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing specs. The photograph underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and ZS35.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS with its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Panasonic ZS35 will render more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 305 gr (0.67 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $450 | $300 |