Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
55 Imaging
76 Features
82 Overall
78
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 204800
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Revealed February 2016
- New Model is Pentax K-1 II
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax K-1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and K-1 (36MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and K-1 (Full frame) possess different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 4 years earlier than the K-1 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the K-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax K-1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax K-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax K-1
XZ-2 iHS | K-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
K-1 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | December 2012 | Newer by 38 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper screen (+117k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K-1
XZ-2 iHS | K-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-1 has proportions of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax K-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the K-1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and K-1 is 85 and 55 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by researching a spec sheet. The image below should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and K-1.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Pentax K-1 will result in more detail having its extra 24 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K-1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2016-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 36MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 7360 x 4912 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 33 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3" | 3.2" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.4fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/200 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 1010 gr (2.23 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | 96 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 14.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 3280 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 760 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Card slots | One | Two |
Pricing at release | $450 | $1,499 |