Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
55 Imaging
77 Features
82 Overall
79
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 819200
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF4 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Launched February 2018
- Older Model is Pentax K-1
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax K-1 II, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and K-1 II (36MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and K-1 II (Full frame) boast different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was introduced 6 years earlier than the K-1 II and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-1 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the K-1 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax K-1 Mark II. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax K-1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax K-1 II
| XZ-2 iHS | K-1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 II over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| K-1 II | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 | December 2012 | Fresher by 63 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display size | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper display (+117k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K-1 II
| XZ-2 iHS | K-1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Pentax K-1 II has proportions of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax K-1 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the K-1 II.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and K-1 II is 85 and 55 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The visual below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and K-1 II.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Pentax K-1 II will give you extra detail using its extra 24MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K-1 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K-1 Mark II |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2012-12-18 | 2018-02-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | PRIME IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 36 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 7360 x 4912 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 819200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 33 |
| Cross focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF4 |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.4fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/200 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 1010 gr (2.23 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | 670 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
| Card slots | 1 | Dual |
| Launch cost | $450 | $1,737 |