Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
55 Imaging
77 Features
82 Overall
79
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 819200
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF4 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Launched February 2018
- Older Model is Pentax K-1
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax K-1 II, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and K-1 II (36MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and K-1 II (Full frame) boast different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-2 iHS was introduced 6 years earlier than the K-1 II and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-1 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the K-1 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax K-1 Mark II. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax K-1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax K-1 II
| XZ-2 iHS | K-1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 II over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| K-1 II | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 | December 2012 | Fresher by 63 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display size | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper display (+117k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K-1 II
| XZ-2 iHS | K-1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Pentax K-1 II has proportions of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax K-1 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the K-1 II.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and K-1 II is 85 and 55 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The visual below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and K-1 II.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Pentax K-1 II will give you extra detail using its extra 24MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-1 II Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K-1 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K-1 Mark II |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2012-12-18 | 2018-02-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | PRIME IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 36 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 7360 x 4912 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 819200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 33 |
| Cross focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF4 |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.4fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/200 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 1010 gr (2.23 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | 670 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
| Card slots | 1 | Dual |
| Launch cost | $450 | $1,737 |