Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-S2
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
64 Imaging
64 Features
82 Overall
71
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-S2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 678g - 123 x 91 x 73mm
- Launched February 2015
- Superseded the Pentax K-S1
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-S2 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax K-S2, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and K-S2 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and K-S2 (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was manufactured 3 years earlier than the K-S2 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-S2 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the K-S2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-S2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax K-S2. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax K-S2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax K-S2
XZ-2 iHS | K-S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-S2 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
K-S2 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | December 2012 | More modern by 26 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K-S2
XZ-2 iHS | K-S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-S2 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-S2 has dimensions of 123mm x 91mm x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") having a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax K-S2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the K-S2.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and K-S2 is 85 and 64 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-S2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The image underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and K-S2.
All in all, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Pentax K-S2 will give you more detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-S2 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K-S2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K-S2 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | PRIME MII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.4 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 678 gr (1.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 123 x 91 x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 410 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $450 | $581 |