Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2959/b2959208e447dba4f569f63d7fd2c62d2a4ed005" alt="Pentax K-x front Pentax K-x front"
69 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 580g - 123 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced December 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K-x, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the K-x (12MP) is very close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and K-x (APS-C) feature different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 3 years later than the K-x and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-x being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the K-x in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax K-x. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax K-x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax K-x
XZ-2 iHS | K-x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | ![]() | December 2009 | More recent by 37 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-x over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
K-x | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K-x
XZ-2 iHS | K-x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Pentax K-x has measurements of 123mm x 92mm x 68mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K-x in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the K-x.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13257/13257bfbb80bee44a583502ff6629e76b02944f0" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and K-x is 85 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fde1/3fde1a22c1c89353f28eb75381c84fa6794a4eaf" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and K-x.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses the exact same megapixel count but different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS offers the smaller sensor which should make getting shallower DOF tougher. The more modern XZ-2 iHS should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cf3f/2cf3f780a2fa6e8211119b06bd1dcf321e877d1b" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8065b/8065b023b2d1385f26c5b1b701d23167dcdfbe93" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K-x Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K-x | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K-x |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-12-23 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Prime |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 16.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 416 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 580 gr (1.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 123 x 92 x 68mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 811 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 1900 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $450 | $600 |