Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K100D S
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
65 Imaging
45 Features
38 Overall
42
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K100D S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 129 x 91 x 71mm
- Released June 2007
- Replaced the Pentax K100D
- Replacement is Pentax K200D
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K100D S Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax K100D S, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and K100D S (6MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and K100D S (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was released 5 years later than the K100D S and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K100D S being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the K100D S in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K100D S Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K100D Super. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Pentax K100D S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax K100D S
XZ-2 iHS | K100D S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | June 2007 | More recent by 67 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 210k | Clearer screen (+710k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K100D S over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
K100D S | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K100D S
XZ-2 iHS | K100D S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K100D S Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Pentax K100D S has dimensions of 129mm x 91mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.8") with a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax K100D S in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the K100D S.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and K100D S is 85 and 65 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K100D S Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading specifications. The graphic here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and K100D S.
Plainly, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K100D S Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K100D S Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K100D Super | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K100D Super |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2007-06-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3008 x 2008 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 210k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 646 gr (1.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 129 x 91 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $450 | $520 |