Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Revealed September 2008
- Old Model is Pentax K100D S
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K200D, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the K200D (10MP) is relatively comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and K200D (APS-C) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 4 years after the K200D which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the K200D with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax K200D. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax K200D
| XZ-2 iHS | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 | September 2008 | More modern by 53 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| K200D | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K200D
| XZ-2 iHS | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Pentax K200D has specifications of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") and a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K200D in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the K200D.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and K200D is 85 and 61 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing specifications. The image here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and K200D.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will produce extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K200D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K200D |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2008-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 690 gr (1.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 22.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | 561 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $450 | $600 |