Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Revealed September 2008
- Old Model is Pentax K100D S
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K200D, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the K200D (10MP) is relatively comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and K200D (APS-C) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 4 years after the K200D which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the K200D with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax K200D. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax K200D
| XZ-2 iHS | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 | September 2008 | More modern by 53 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| K200D | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K200D
| XZ-2 iHS | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Pentax K200D has specifications of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") and a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K200D in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the K200D.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and K200D is 85 and 61 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing specifications. The image here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and K200D.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will produce extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K200D Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K200D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K200D |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2008-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 690 gr (1.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 22.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | 561 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $450 | $600 |