Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
95 Imaging
34 Features
10 Overall
24
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 145g - 93 x 58 x 24mm
- Announced September 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax E85, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E85 (12MP) is fairly similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and E85 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 3 years after the E85 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the E85 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax Optio E85. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax E85 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax E85
| XZ-2 iHS | E85 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2012 | September 2009 | More modern by 40 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax E85 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| E85 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax E85
| XZ-2 iHS | E85 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Pentax E85 has measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax E85 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the E85.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and E85 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The image here should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and E85.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS has the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler. The more modern XZ-2 iHS is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio E85 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio E85 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-09-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 32-96mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.9-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 145 gr (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 93 x 58 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI95 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $450 | $0 |