Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
95 Imaging
34 Features
10 Overall
24
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 145g - 93 x 58 x 24mm
- Announced September 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax E85, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E85 (12MP) is fairly similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and E85 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 3 years after the E85 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the E85 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax Optio E85. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax E85 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax E85
| XZ-2 iHS | E85 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2012 | September 2009 | More modern by 40 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax E85 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| E85 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax E85
| XZ-2 iHS | E85 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Pentax E85 has measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax E85 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the E85.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and E85 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The image here should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and E85.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS has the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler. The more modern XZ-2 iHS is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E85 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio E85 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio E85 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-09-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 32-96mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.9-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 145 gr (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 93 x 58 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI95 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $450 | $0 |