Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RS1500
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
93 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RS1500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-110mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced March 2011
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RS1500 Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RS1500, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the RS1500 (14MP) is relatively close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and RS1500 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-2 iHS was introduced 22 months after the RS1500 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the RS1500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RS1500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax Optio RS1500. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Pentax RS1500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax RS1500
XZ-2 iHS | RS1500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | March 2011 | More modern by 22 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax RS1500 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
RS1500 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax RS1500
XZ-2 iHS | RS1500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RS1500 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Pentax RS1500 has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RS1500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the RS1500.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and RS1500 is 85 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RS1500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through technical specs. The pic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and RS1500.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Pentax RS1500 will render greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RS1500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RS1500 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio RS1500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio RS1500 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2011-03-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-110mm (3.9x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 157g (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 260 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $450 | $150 |