Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ10
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Released July 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ10 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax RZ10, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the RZ10 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and RZ10 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 18 months after the RZ10 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the RZ10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax Optio RZ10. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax RZ10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax RZ10
| XZ-2 iHS | RZ10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 18 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ10 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| RZ10 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax RZ10
| XZ-2 iHS | RZ10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ10 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Pentax RZ10 has proportions of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax RZ10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the RZ10.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and RZ10 is 85 and 92 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading through technical specs. The image here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and RZ10.
As you can tell, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Pentax RZ10 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS should have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ10 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio RZ10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 2.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 178g (0.39 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | 178 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $450 | $200 |