Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38d51/38d51722498199a5f5c8987789b057fb21cf9178" alt="Pentax Optio W60 front Pentax Optio W60 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 165g - 98 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax W60, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the W60 (10MP) is very well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and W60 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 3 years after the W60 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the W60 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax Optio W60. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax W60 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax W60
XZ-2 iHS | W60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 43 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax W60 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
W60 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax W60
XZ-2 iHS | W60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Pentax W60 has specifications of 98mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax W60 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the W60.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b88/e2b88eaa9fd90ff4e7d3ecdd9f6ec44b475c8563" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and W60 is 85 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf941/cf9414ec47e93bfc08565812a2b2a2df7a3a5900" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and W60.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will give you greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/719d2/719d21830a03e3514337d7cc079451342a4897db" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e06e/3e06e30068d956ae36ff64652b697038ed017aca" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax W60 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio W60 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio W60 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2009-07-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Soft, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720, 15fps, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 30/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | 165 grams (0.36 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 98 x 56 x 25mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI78 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $450 | $300 |