Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2011
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the WG-1 (14MP) is very similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-1 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe XZ-2 iHS was released 23 months later than the WG-1 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the WG-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax Optio WG-1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax WG-1
XZ-2 iHS | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | February 2011 | More recent by 23 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
WG-1 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax WG-1
XZ-2 iHS | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Pentax WG-1 has measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the WG-1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-1 is 85 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-1.
Plainly, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Pentax WG-1 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The newer XZ-2 iHS is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2011-02-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 157g (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 260 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $450 | $350 |