Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax WG-2, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-2 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-2 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 11 months after the WG-2 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the WG-2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax Optio WG-2. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax WG-2
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 | February 2012 | More modern by 11 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| WG-2 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax WG-2
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax WG-2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the WG-2.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-2 is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The pic underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-2.
Plainly, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Pentax WG-2 will offer more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-12-18 | 2012-02-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 192g (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | 260 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $450 | $350 |