Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q10
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
92 Imaging
36 Features
56 Overall
44
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q10 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q10, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the Q10 (12MP) is very close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and Q10 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 4 months after the Q10 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q10 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the Q10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax Q10. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Pentax Q10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax Q10
| XZ-2 iHS | Q10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q10 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| Q10 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax Q10
| XZ-2 iHS | Q10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2012 |  | September 2012 | Same generation |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q10 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q10 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q10 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the Q10.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and Q10 is 85 and 92 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and Q10.
As you can see, both of the cameras have got the exact same megapixels but not the same sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS provides the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF less difficult.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q10 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q10 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Q10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Q10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2012-09-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 7.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Trailing-curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/2000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 200 grams (0.44 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 21.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 10.9 |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | 183 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | 270 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $450 | $350 |