Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49


93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax WG-10, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the WG-10 (14MP) is very well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-10 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.

The XZ-2 iHS was announced 6 months before the WG-10 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the WG-10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax WG-10. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Pentax WG-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax WG-10
XZ-2 iHS | WG-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
WG-10 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax WG-10
XZ-2 iHS | WG-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | ![]() | June 2013 | Similar generation |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Pentax WG-10 has sizing of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax WG-10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the WG-10.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-10 is 85 and 93 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specs. The image here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-10.
All in all, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS having a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Pentax WG-10 will give greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-10 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax WG-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax WG-10 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2013-06-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 0.7fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 1.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 260 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $450 | $0 |