Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax WG-3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-3 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-3 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 7 months earlier than the WG-3 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the WG-3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax WG-3. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax WG-3
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| WG-3 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2013 | December 2012 | More recent by 7 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax WG-3
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax WG-3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the WG-3.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-3 is 85 and 90 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through specifications. The photograph below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-3.
To sum up, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Pentax WG-3 will render extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax WG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax WG-3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2013-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | 240 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $450 | $300 |