Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax WG-3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-3 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-3 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 7 months earlier than the WG-3 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the WG-3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax WG-3. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax WG-3
XZ-2 iHS | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
WG-3 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2013 | December 2012 | More recent by 7 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax WG-3
XZ-2 iHS | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax WG-3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the WG-3.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-3 is 85 and 90 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through specifications. The photograph below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-3.
To sum up, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Pentax WG-3 will render extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax WG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax WG-3 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2013-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 240 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $450 | $300 |