Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
The following is a extended review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax WG-3 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 7 months prior to the WG-3 GPS which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the WG-3 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax WG-3 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| WG-3 GPS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 | December 2012 | Newer by 7 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax WG-3 GPS
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 GPS has measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax WG-3 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the WG-3 GPS.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-3 GPS is 85 and 90 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading specifications. The image underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-3 GPS.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Pentax WG-3 GPS will offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2013-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 238 gr (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photos | 240 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $450 | $350 |