Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX2
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX2, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and CX2 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 3 years after the CX2 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the CX2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Ricoh CX2. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh CX2
| XZ-2 iHS | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 41 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| CX2 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh CX2
| XZ-2 iHS | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 920k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the CX2.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and CX2 is 85 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The picture underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and CX2.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will deliver extra detail having its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh CX2 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-08-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | 185 grams (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $341 |