Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX3
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh CX3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is pretty similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and CX3 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-2 iHS was introduced 2 years later than the CX3 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the CX3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh CX3. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh CX3
XZ-2 iHS | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | June 2010 | More recent by 31 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
CX3 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh CX3
XZ-2 iHS | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh CX3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the CX3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and CX3 is 85 and 92 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements just by reading specs. The photograph here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and CX3.
All in all, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer you greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS provides an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh CX3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh CX3 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $450 | $329 |