Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- New Model is Ricoh GR II
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and GR (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 4 months earlier than the GR and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the GR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Ricoh GR. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh GR
| XZ-2 iHS | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| GR | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 920k | Crisper screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GR
| XZ-2 iHS | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 |  | April 2013 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the GR.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and GR is 85 and 90 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by seeing specs. The pic here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and GR.
All in all, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS with its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Ricoh GR will show greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh GR |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2013-04-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 300 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | 290 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $450 | $971 |