Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Below is a complete overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/1.7").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-2 iHS was released 16 months later than the GR Digital IV which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a brief summary of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the GR Digital IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
XZ-2 iHS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | September 2011 | More recent by 16 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
GR Digital IV | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | 920k | Sharper screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital IV
XZ-2 iHS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the GR Digital IV.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and GR Digital IV is 85 and 92 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements simply by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and GR Digital IV.
Clearly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus XZ-2 iHS to result in extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 390 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $450 | $599 |