Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR II

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Ricoh GR II front
Portability
89
Imaging
59
Features
55
Overall
57

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Released December 2012
Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Launched June 2015
  • Superseded the Ricoh GR
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR II Overview

Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GR II, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and GR II (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and GR II (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The XZ-2 iHS was launched 3 years earlier than the GR II and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the GR II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh GR II

 XZ-2 iHS GR II 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 GR II XZ-2 iHS 
LaunchedJune 2015December 2012Fresher by 30 months
Screen resolution1230k920kClearer screen (+310k dot)

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GR II

 XZ-2 iHS GR II 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Ricoh GR II has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).

Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GR II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the GR II.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR II size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and GR II is 85 and 89 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and GR II.

All in all, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Ricoh GR II will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Portrait photography with Ricoh GR II
46
focusing manually
offers face detection focusing
supports RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
75
you can focus manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography details
Ricoh GR II Street photography details
66
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
small sensor (1/1.7")
heavier than others (346g)
74
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competitors (251 grams)
good ISO range (25,600)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR II as a Sports photography camera
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking autofocus
great battery pack (340 per charge)
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect AF
50
MP count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports tracking autofocus
can't change focal length (28mm)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
lack of phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography info
Ricoh GR II Travel photography info
61
great battery pack (340 per charge)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (346g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
67
lighter than competitors (251g)
MP count good (16MP)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography information
Ricoh GR II Landscape photography information
55
focusing manually
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
great battery pack (340 shots)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
59
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3 inch)
MP count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Vlogging with Ricoh GR II
36
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have external mic support
screen isn't selfie friendly
heavier than others (346 grams)
32
supports face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (251 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
doesn't have external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GR II
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSRicoh GR II
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus XZ-2 iHS Ricoh GR II
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Released 2012-12-18 2015-06-17
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - GR Engine V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO 12800 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/2.8-16.0
Macro focusing distance 1cm 10cm
Crop factor 4.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 920k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Optical (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 300 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 3.00 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 346 grams (0.76 pounds) 251 grams (0.55 pounds)
Dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 49 80
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 23.6
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 13.7
DXO Low light rating 216 1078
Other
Battery life 340 photos 320 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-90B DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $450 $599