Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
85
Imaging
36
Features
67
Overall
48
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Announced December 2012
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Launched February 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

Below is a detailed review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 11 months later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 XZ-2 iHS GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
LaunchedDecember 2012February 2012More recent by 11 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 XZ-2 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 XZ-2 iHS GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Display resolution920k920kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has specifications of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 85 and 69 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The photograph here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will give you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The newer XZ-2 iHS provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography advice
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Portrait photography advice
45
has manual focus
has face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
73
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
has face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography info
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography info
65
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
heavier than competitors (346 grams)
55
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
more heavy than competition (550g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Sports photography camera
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
good battery life (340 shots)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect AF
48
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography highlights
61
good battery life (340 shots)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors (346g)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
58
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
more heavy than competition (550 grams)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography advice
54
has manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (340 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
lack of Time Lapse mode
62
focusing manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
36
pretty wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
has mic port
screen is not selfie friendly
heavier than competitors (346g)
24
reasonably wide (24mm)
has face detect autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone jack
more heavy than competition (550g)
Photography Glossary

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSRicoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus XZ-2 iHS Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Type Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2012-12-18 2012-02-02
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 4928 x 3264
Max native ISO 12800 3200
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-85mm (3.5x)
Largest aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 4.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 180s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/3200s
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 346 grams (0.76 pounds) 550 grams (1.21 pounds)
Dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 images 400 images
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-90B DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $450 $871