Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
69 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Launched February 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 11 months later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| XZ-2 iHS | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 | February 2012 | More recent by 11 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| XZ-2 iHS | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has specifications of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 85 and 69 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The photograph here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will give you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The newer XZ-2 iHS provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2012-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | 550 grams (1.21 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | 400 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $450 | $871 |