Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
84 Imaging
52 Features
39 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Introduced August 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is fairly comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 17 months after the GXR Mount A12 making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the GXR Mount A12 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
| XZ-2 iHS | GXR Mount A12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 | August 2011 | Newer by 17 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| GXR Mount A12 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
| XZ-2 iHS | GXR Mount A12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 920k | The same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has specifications of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the GXR Mount A12.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and GXR Mount A12 is 85 and 84 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through a spec sheet. The image below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and GXR Mount A12.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count but not the same sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS uses the smaller sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF tougher. The more recent XZ-2 iHS will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2011-08-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/9000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 9.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 370 gr (0.82 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | 330 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $349 |