Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49


85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/1.7").

The XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 2 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
XZ-2 iHS | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | ![]() | March 2010 | Fresher by 34 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
XZ-2 iHS | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 85 and 85 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The graphic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus XZ-2 iHS to give greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 355 grams (0.78 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | 410 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $450 | $349 |