Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Announced December 2012
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Photography Glossary

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/1.7").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 2 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 XZ-2 iHS GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
RevealedDecember 2012March 2010Fresher by 34 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC XZ-2 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 XZ-2 iHS GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Screen resolution920k920kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 85 and 85 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The graphic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Plainly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus XZ-2 iHS to give greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography details
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography details
46
you can focus manually
comes with face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
36
you can focus manually
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography factors
66
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
sensor is small (1/1.7")
heavier than competition (346 grams)
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
lighter than average (355 grams)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (340 per charge)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
has no phase detect AF
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
61
better than average battery life (340 per charge)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (346 grams)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
60
lighter than average (355 grams)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography information
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography information
55
you can focus manually
decently wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (340 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
lack of Time Lapse recording
47
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
low MP (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
36
decently wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
has external mic socket
does not posses selfie friendly display
heavier than competition (346 grams)
28
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (355 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSRicoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus XZ-2 iHS Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Class Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2012-12-18 2010-03-18
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 12800 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 180s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate - 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 4.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 346 grams (0.76 lb) 355 grams (0.78 lb)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 images 410 images
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-90B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $450 $349