Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00824/00824e2e030060ae2d852df421725305faf82c50" alt="Ricoh PX front Ricoh PX front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Announced August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh PX, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and PX (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and PX (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was introduced 17 months after the PX which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the PX when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Ricoh PX. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh PX
XZ-2 iHS | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | ![]() | August 2011 | Newer by 17 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
PX | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh PX
XZ-2 iHS | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Ricoh PX has measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh PX in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the PX.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96db1/96db19cb6fd5de13355dc193f80a96d4733bafda" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and PX is 85 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc1f4/cc1f468508aa498192a963d2a9e34226e1dee55e" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching specs. The picture here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and PX.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh PX will provide you with greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3d61/e3d610ac9299b94dbd0caac9a6ae93d86e09ac1c" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26980/269805cbb91e1d1e4b65803aa7c9c3814b3ef892" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh PX Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh PX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh PX |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3072 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.9-5.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 156 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $450 | $329 |