Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh WG-30, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-30 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 22 months before the WG-30 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the WG-30 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-30. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-30
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| WG-30 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 | December 2012 | More recent by 22 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-30
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh WG-30 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the WG-30.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-30 is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by looking at technical specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-30.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-30 will resolve extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 192g (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $428 |