Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-4 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-2 iHS was released 13 months before the WG-4 which makes them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the WG-4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-4
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| WG-4 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | December 2012 | Fresher by 13 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the WG-4.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-4 is 85 and 90 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading through technical specs. The visual underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-4.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Ricoh WG-4 will give more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $330 |