Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-4 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-2 iHS was released 13 months before the WG-4 which makes them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the WG-4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-4
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| WG-4 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | December 2012 | Fresher by 13 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the WG-4.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-4 is 85 and 90 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading through technical specs. The visual underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-4.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Ricoh WG-4 will give more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $330 |