Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49


90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.

The XZ-2 iHS was brought out 13 months before the WG-4 GPS which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the WG-4 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
XZ-2 iHS | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
WG-4 GPS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | December 2012 | More recent by 13 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
XZ-2 iHS | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the WG-4 GPS.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-4 GPS is 85 and 90 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through technical specs. The visual underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-4 GPS.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will resolve more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 235 gr (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 240 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $450 | $210 |