Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Introduced December 2012
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Introduced February 2014
  • Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The XZ-2 iHS was brought out 13 months before the WG-4 GPS which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the WG-4 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

				

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 XZ-2 iHS WG-4 GPS 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 WG-4 GPS XZ-2 iHS 
IntroducedFebruary 2014December 2012More recent by 13 months

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 XZ-2 iHS WG-4 GPS 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).

Check the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the WG-4 GPS.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-4 GPS is 85 and 90 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison

Generally, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through technical specs. The visual underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-4 GPS.

As you have seen, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will resolve more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Portrait photography details
46
manual focus
has face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
41
focusing manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focusing
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Street photography camera
66
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
heavier than average in class (346g)
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than competition (235g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography features
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography features
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
better than average battery life (340 shots)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
has no phase detect AF
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
weather proof
max fps very slow (2.0 frames/s)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (240 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography highlights
61
better than average battery life (340 shots)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than average in class (346 grams)
MP count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
69
weather proof
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery life (240 CIPA)
more heavy than competition (235g)
screen is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography features
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography features
55
manual focus
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (340 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
doesn't have Time Lapse function
54
focusing manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
weather proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
terrible battery life (240 CIPA)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
36
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have mic port
screen isn't selfie friendly
heavier than average in class (346 grams)
34
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing microphone port
more heavy than competition (235g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSRicoh WG-4 GPS
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus XZ-2 iHS Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Introduced 2012-12-18 2014-02-05
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 12800 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 346 gr (0.76 pounds) 235 gr (0.52 pounds)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 pictures 240 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-90B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $450 $210