Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Portability
85
Imaging
36
Features
67
Overall
48
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Ricoh WG-5 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Revealed December 2012
Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
  • Introduced February 2015
  • Older Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
  • Refreshed by Ricoh WG-6
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview

Here is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The XZ-2 iHS was brought out 3 years prior to the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the WG-5 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS

 XZ-2 iHS WG-5 GPS 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 WG-5 GPS XZ-2 iHS 
IntroducedFebruary 2015December 2012Fresher by 26 months

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-5 GPS

 XZ-2 iHS WG-5 GPS 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).

Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the WG-5 GPS.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-5 GPS is 85 and 90 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The visual here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-5 GPS.

Clearly, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS will deliver extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Portrait photography details
45
has manual focus
features face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
41
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
includes face detect autofocus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-5 GPS as a Street photography camera
65
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
small sensor (1/1.7")
heavier than competition in class (346 grams)
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than competitors in class (236 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography factors
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sports photography factors
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking focus
great battery (340 per charge)
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
48
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
includes tracking focus
weather proof
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery life (240 CIPA)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-5 GPS as a Travel photography camera
61
great battery (340 shots)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (346 grams)
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
69
weather proof
good MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
bad battery life (240 per charge)
more heavy than competitors in class (236 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-5 GPS as a Landscape photography camera
54
has manual focus
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
great battery (340 CIPA)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
lack of Time Lapse recording
54
manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
weather proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
bad battery life (240 CIPA)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
36
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has mic support
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
heavier than competition in class (346g)
34
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone socket
more heavy than competitors in class (236 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSRicoh WG-5 GPS
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus XZ-2 iHS Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Revealed 2012-12-18 2015-02-10
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 12800 6400
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 14.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 10.40 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 346 grams (0.76 lb) 236 grams (0.52 lb)
Dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 shots 240 shots
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-90B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots One One
Price at release $450 $500