Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-6
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Here is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 3 years prior to the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the WG-5 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| WG-5 GPS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 | December 2012 | Fresher by 26 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the WG-5 GPS.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-5 GPS is 85 and 90 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The visual here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-5 GPS.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS will deliver extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 14.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 236 grams (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | 240 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $450 | $500 |