Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- Updated by Ricoh WG-80
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-70 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 8 years prior to the WG-70 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the WG-70 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Ricoh WG-70. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-70
XZ-2 iHS | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
WG-70 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2020 | December 2012 | Newer by 86 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-70
XZ-2 iHS | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the WG-70.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-70 is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through specs. The image here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-70.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh WG-70 will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-70 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2020-02-04 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | 300 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $450 | $280 |