Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49


91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2022
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-70

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Here is a extended overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-80, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-80 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-80 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 10 years before the WG-80 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the WG-80 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Ricoh WG-80. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-80
XZ-2 iHS | WG-80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
WG-80 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2022 | ![]() | December 2012 | Fresher by 114 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-80
XZ-2 iHS | WG-80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outer dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-80 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the WG-80.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-80 is 85 and 91 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-80.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS having a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh WG-80 will produce extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images far more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-80 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2022-05-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.70 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 300 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $450 | $300 |