Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Ricoh WG-80 front
Portability
91
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Introduced December 2012
Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.70" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Revealed May 2022
  • Older Model is Ricoh WG-70
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview

Here is a extended overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-80, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-80 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-80 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 10 years before the WG-80 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the WG-80 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-80

 XZ-2 iHS WG-80 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.70"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 WG-80 XZ-2 iHS 
RevealedMay 2022December 2012Fresher by 114 months

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-80

 XZ-2 iHS WG-80 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outer dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-80 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the WG-80.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-80 is 85 and 91 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-80.

As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS having a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh WG-80 will produce extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images far more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-80 as a Portrait photography camera
46
manual focus
includes face detection focus
supports RAW files
low MP (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
43
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
comes with face detect autofocus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-80 as a Street photography camera
66
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
more heavy than competition (346 grams)
55
weather proofing
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-80
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking autofocus
great battery pack (340 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
no phase detect auto focus
43
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
weather proofing
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography factors
Ricoh WG-80 Travel photography factors
61
great battery pack (340 shots)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (346g)
low MP (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
71
weather proofing
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-80 as a Landscape photography camera
55
manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
great battery pack (340 shots)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
lack of Timelapse recording
44
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.70")
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging highlights
Ricoh WG-80 Vlogging highlights
36
relatively wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with external microphone support
display isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than competition (346g)
31
fairly wide (28mm)
comes with face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
no mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-80
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSRicoh WG-80
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus XZ-2 iHS Ricoh WG-80
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Introduced 2012-12-18 2022-05-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 12800 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.70 inch
Resolution of display 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless On, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 346 gr (0.76 lb) 193 gr (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 photos 300 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-90B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $450 $300