Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f21bb/f21bbba72691e81aa737426aec1e12ce3349a5bb" alt="Samsung DV300F front Samsung DV300F front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Released January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung DV300F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and DV300F (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and DV300F (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 12 months after the DV300F and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the DV300F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung DV300F. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung DV300F
XZ-2 iHS | DV300F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 12 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
DV300F | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung DV300F
XZ-2 iHS | DV300F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Samsung DV300F has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung DV300F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the DV300F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16948/169483e64c86a5c86d19707bf822e543b2b8bfb8" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and DV300F is 85 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46836/46836420b28a0f8339c3db79da82fc226c4fb3ee" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and DV300F.
As you can see, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung DV300F will provide you with more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/560cd/560cdc07d7dfd2a129861bef859bab439a3822a5" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9c9a/d9c9afa4586261e641509fd77920e916d3d6f393" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung DV300F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung DV300F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2012-01-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | 133 grams (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | BP88 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $450 | $200 |