Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
90 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Released December 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung EX2F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is fairly well matched and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/1.7").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was launched very close to the EX2F which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the EX2F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Samsung EX2F. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung EX2F
| XZ-2 iHS | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k | 0k | Crisper display (+920k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX2F | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung EX2F
| XZ-2 iHS | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 | December 2012 | Similar age | |
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has sizing of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung EX2F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the EX2F.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and EX2F is 85 and 90 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through specs. The graphic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and EX2F.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures though you really should factor the launch date of the products into consideration.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung EX2F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | 294 grams (0.65 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 49 | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $478 |